Dr. Shauly
Research
Devices
Digital Curbside
Innovation
Podcast
About
Contact

Dr. Orr Shauly

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

ResearchDevicesDigital CurbsideInnovationPodcastAboutContact

© 2026 Dr. Orr Shauly

LinkedInInstagramX / Twitter
← All publications

April 2021

Crowd-Sourcing Public Perceptions of Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release

Primary surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is performed using an open or endoscopic technique.

Why this matters

Primary surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is performed using an open or endoscopic technique. This work contributes to evidence-based plastic and reconstructive surgery — helping clinicians interpret outcomes, refine technique, and counsel patients with clearer data.

Author

Dr. Orr Shauly

Plastic and reconstructive surgery resident at Emory University (UCLA BS, USC MD) with an h-index of 15 and peer-reviewed work spanning aesthetic surgery, reconstruction, medical devices, and AI in medicine.

AboutAll researchRequest full text →

Abstract

Primary surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is performed using an open or endoscopic technique. This study aimed to gather data on public perception of the cost, recovery, and associated potential complications of these two techniques. Participants were recruited using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk©) and presented with a series of scenarios regarding open or endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Scenarios involved cost differential, duration of recovery, surgical technique, and potential complications following surgery. Participants were asked to provide a utility score between 0 and 100, with 0 representing the equivalent of death and 100 representing the participant feeling they were in perfect health. A total of 410 participants completed the survey. Participant demographic data included average age of 37.78 (range 18–78), 62.4% female participants, 83.4% right-handed, 78.7% worked full- or part-time jobs, and 56.5% would be unable to complete their work with one hand immobilized. Participants favored endoscopic versus open surgery in both dominant and non-dominant hands (p < 0.0001). However, they viewed temporary paresthesia from endoscopic surgery less favorably to significant surgical site tenderness in open carpal tunnel release in both dominant and non-dominant hands (p < 0.0001). When considering cost, recovery duration, and technical ability required by the surgeon, patients prefer endoscopic carpal tunnel release over open surgery in both dominant and non-dominant hands. Subgroup analysis suggests that attitudes towards endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release are not influenced by ability to perform work with the hand immobilized or income level.

Request full text